In procurement, the cheapest option often comes with hidden trade-offs. When purchasing managers compare prices from different rollator manufacturers, they must adopt a holistic approach that considers both monetary and non-monetary factors.
Begin with a model that evaluates price alongside quality, compliance, delivery performance, and innovation. This ensures suppliers are compared on a fair, multi-dimensional basis.
Consider all direct and indirect costs over the product’s lifecycle, including acquisition, maintenance, downtime, and disposal. A slightly higher upfront price may lead to significant savings in the long run.
Evaluate the financial health, operational capacity, and market reputation of each supplier. A stable partner is more likely to meet commitments consistently.
Gather input from end-users, such as healthcare staff or patients, to gain insights into product usability, comfort, and durability. These qualitative factors often reveal strengths and weaknesses overlooked by technical specs.
Track supplier performance metrics—delivery accuracy, defect rates, and responsiveness—to inform future negotiations and renewals.
Consider supply chain resilience, contingency plans, and alternative sourcing strategies to minimize procurement risks.
By implementing a comprehensive price and value assessment framework, procurement managers can ensure that rollator purchases deliver both immediate cost efficiency and sustainable operational benefits. This strategic approach transforms price comparison into a powerful decision-making tool.
READ MORE: